The Batman
Rumors are fly around that Robert Pattinson has been redact as Batman in Matt Reeves’The Batman , and it ’s caused quite a stir on the net . People just ca n’t seem to get past the fact that R - Pats play Edward in theTwilightfilms , and that ’s all they see when you say the name , Robert Pattinson .
However , ever since those movies , the British actor has work on to star in a series of main films that really showcase his talent as an actor . That said , there are a few films in his canon which do show Pattinson ’s flaws as an actor . We ’re now going to go through five moving picture which prove he will make an excellentBatman , and five that do n’t .
No: Twilight
Many people dislike the idea of Robert Pattinson as Batman because of theTwilightmovies , and that ’s completely apprehensible . He played the vampire Edward in the movie adaptations of Stephanie Myer ’s books , and it radically changed the supposedly blood - sucking monsters forever and a day — not in a good way .
Pattinson ’s performance could be describe as ' dusty ' , and you would n’t be wrong saying that . His Edward is saturnine , incubation , and at clip rather angry for no apparent reason . However , this is more a problem with the writing rather than Pattinson ’s performance . He was simply doing what he was told to do . That aver , if his Bruce Wayne ends up being anything like Edward , then people wo n’t be felicitous .
Yes: Good Time
Good Timeis a fascinating autonomous movie in which Pattinson plays a theatrical role call Connie Nikas . He ends up take his disabled brother Nick out of a therapy academic session before robbing a New York City bank for $ 65,000 , and things take a twist for the worse .
skillful Timeis a will to Pattinson ’s abilities as an worker . Directed by Josh and Benny Safdie and written by Josh Safdie and Ronald Bronstein , Pattinson exhibit what he can do if he ’s give beneficial source material , and his performance in this plastic film is spellbinding . earnestly , if you think he wo n’t make a respectable Batman because " he ’s not a talented enough actor , " then you have to watch this film .
No: Harry Potter And The Goblet of Fire
Robert Pattinson first issue forth onto people ’s radar when he play Cedric Diggory in the Potter movies . Well , he was only in one of them . The purpose was an interesting grapheme in the books . He was an 1 seeker and was actually good than Harry Potter . He was a whiz in Hogwarts and very fine-looking .
Unfortunately , he pall at the wand of Voldemort , which was sad . The reason this film is on this list as a reason Pattinson might not be a safe Batman is because he does n’t really do much in the moving-picture show . The role ’s interesting in the Koran , but he ’s given very small to do in the moving-picture show , which is really a shame .
Yes: Life
InLife , Robert Pattinson plays renowned photographer , Dennis Stock , along with Dane DeHaan as James Dean . The moving picture keep an eye on Dennis as he ’s asked to shoot James just before he filmsEast of Eden .
The motion-picture show itself is n’t the best ever made , and yet Pattinson ’s performance shows a maturity we had n’t visit from him before . He perfectly embody the role of Dennis , and if he were to get that sort of dedication to the Batman role , then rooter should n’t have anything to worry about .
No: Remember Me
recall Meis well one of Pattinson ’s weakest motion-picture show , not include theTwilightfilms . Pattinson play Tyler Hawkins , and the film come after him and his lover , Ally ( played by Emilie de Ravin ) . Tyler ’s parents have split after his comrade ’s self-annihilation , and Ally see her female parent ’s murder . He ’s now make certain she lives each day to its wide-cut .
It ’s a rather lamentable and shocking piece , and yet Pattinson does n’t get an opportunity to really bend his acting muscle , despite its bare subject subject and even bleaker end . It just all palpate a mo too much and was n’t one of his best acting functioning .
Yes: The Rover
Now , The Roveris a motion-picture show to take notice of . It ’s limit in a dystopian hereafter , but it ’s not one of ' those ' films . It ’s a real powerhouse of a flick , and Robert Pattinson is doing something in it he ’s never done before . He play Reynolds , who ’s a very uninitiated young serviceman from the southern parts of the U.S.
Though Guy Pearce also stars inThe Rover , Pattinson almost outshines him , and that ’s proof of what a fine worker Pattinson really is . Now , there ’s not much , if any , of Bruce Wayne in this execution , but it just shows his incredible versatility as an doer .
No: Water For Elephants
Post - Twilight , Robert Pattinson did everything he could to distance himself from those films . However , he did finish up appear in another romantic motion-picture show after . Water For Elephantsis perfectly okay . It stars bighearted name such as Reese Witherspoon and Christoph Waltz . Yet , it was very much in the same kind of territory as theTwilightfilms , and he was n’t really getting the opportunity to show that he was more than just the guy who diddle Edward .
That enunciate , Pattinson ’s operation is perfectly solid here , but unlike some of his other employment , he ’s not pushing the boundaries of what he can do . He ’s stay on securely within the line many had descend to expect from him as an doer . It was n’t until later on that he really set out to strut his stuff on the silver screen .
Yes: The Lost City of Z
Once again , Robert Pattinson choose not to take the lead role in a movie because he pick up something far more interesting in one of the supporting characters . Pattinson has displayed throughout his career that he ’s more concerned in the purpose and the theatre director . He does n’t handle about billing or about the money . He wish about the craft and who he ’s working with .
The Lost City of Zgave him the opportunity to go with James Gray , who had made films likeTwo devotee , We Own the Night , andThe Immigrant . These are n’t terrific plastic film , but Gray had evince a talent for working with the best actors and getting brilliant performances out of them . He certainly work his illusion with Pattinson since he ’s superb as Henry Costlin . Despite only being a secondary character , Pattinson steadfastly steal the limelight from the film ’s wind , Charlie Hunnam . If you watch this moving picture and still do n’t trust Pattinson ’s act as abilities , then there ’s no hope .
No: Bel Ami
Bel Ami , barricade theTwilightfilms , is easily the worst film Pattinson has ever been in . To make things worse , his performance is n’t very good in it . If people were saying they were worried about Pattinson as Batman after having seenBel Ami , then that would be understandable .
He ’s rather wooden as George Duroy , and given that this motion picture amount out soon after his prison term in theTwilightfilms , it was n’t a good sign of the zodiac . However , this was the character of picture he was being offered at the time . It was rather grimy than theTwilightmovies , and he did take a bit of a risk in accepting the role . However , he went on to much better things after this pic , and give thanks God he did .
Yes: Cosmopolis
Pattinson has said in the past that he cares more about who ’s engineer the film than the movie itself . He said he has a list of directors he was desperate to mold with and he ’d do anything to be in one of their movies . David Cronenberg was one of those directors , and they ’ve worked together twice now . Cosmopolisis rather dissentious , like all of Cronenberg ’s films , really . However , no one can deny how mesmerizing Pattinson is in the tether .
He play Eric Packer , a billionaire who turn on through Manhattan in a stretch limousine place to his barber and meets a series of invitee along the way . If you watch over this film and do n’t think that Pattinson would make an splendid Bruce Wayne , then nothing else will . He ’s fantastic in the film andCosmopolisalone should be enough to get him the Batman role .
NEXT : The net ’s 10 Best Memes & Reactions To Robert Pattinson As The New Batman
