Related
Remakes are always a tricky thing to pull off in the film business . This can be especially dependable of repulsion film . So much of what make a revulsion motion-picture show successful is that the interview does n’t know what is going to chance next . If you ’re remaking a story that has already been severalise , you ’ll need to give the audience something particular .
On those rarefied occasion , some horror remake have not only been worthwhile , but they ’ve demonstrate to be more frightening than the original . Of course , there are also many remaking that do n’t come close to the terror of its source material . Here are some of the horror remakes that are scary than the original and some that flow far shortsighted .
Scarier: The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (2003)
The Michael Bay - produced remake ofThe Texas Chainsaw Massacrewas the picture that kick - started a trend of remakes of classic horror plastic film in Hollywood . To be sure , the original film is the far more interesting and well - made plastic film , but many the great unwashed forget that film is not as gory and affright - filled as its reputation suggests . It ’s sure as shooting unsettling but it is more atmospherical with a lot of dark humor thrown in .
This remake , while fairly straight - forward , does n’t take on so nicely . It is a gory and brutal film with some memorable kill and a very intimidating Leatherface . It certainly fare better than the many remake it exalt .
Not Scary: Halloween (2007)
One of those authoritative horror films to get the remaking handling following the succeeder ofThe Texas Chainsaw Massacrewas John Carpenter ’s ground - breakingHalloween . Carpenter ’s original helped to specify the slasher genre which has been a staple in the writing style ever since . unluckily , it was also a quieter thriller which this remake for certain is not .
LikeThe Texas Chainsaw Massacreremake , this film adjudicate to go even bloodier than the original . Unfortunately , it just leaves a bad taste in the mouth of the watcher . Rob Zombie ’s approach makes to a vile , grimy slog that gives us the longer Michael Myers origin no one need for .
Scarier: The Crazies (2010)
George A. Romero is one of the most influential the great unwashed in the world of revulsion filmmaking . His zombi movies plunge the genre ’s obsession with the undead . However , The Craziesremains one of his lesser - known and the fantastic remake is sadly also overlooked .
The movie is set in a small town where the army is seek to contain a computer virus outbreak which turns the infected into emotionless and murderous psychotic person . The remaking focuses on the idea of those in power being as dangerous as those who are infected . The film was some excellent , pulse - thump sequences and a surprising bit of dark humour .
Not Scary: Psycho (1998)
It mus be said , it took a lot of guts for Gus Van Sant to make over one of the most beloved and popular horror movies of all - prison term . alas , that ’s about all the ripe you’re able to say about this moving picture .
Van Sant seemed to understand that Hitchcock ’s piece of work in the original could not be topped , so he did a bourgeon - for - shot recreation of the original . Despite the loyalty to the original cloth , a lot of what made that picture special disappears . From the miscasting of Vince Vaughn as Norman Bates , to the colorized format , it all feels like a pointless film task .
Scarier: Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978)
The original 1956 edition ofInvasion of the Body Snatcherswas met with indifference at the time of its initial release . Years afterward it was recognized as one of the writing style ’s unspoilt . The 1978 remake follow a interchangeable path as it was a forget film for a identification number of years before its brilliance was after recognized .
The film involve an encroachment of noncitizen who have the ability to make an accurate copy of human beings they issue forth in contact lens with . The remake elevated the level of paranoia that makes this a tense and dreadful thriller with a iconic terminal that propose a horse sense of hopelessness .
Not: A Nightmare On Elm Street (2010)
Wes Craven’sA Nightmare on Elm Streetwas a wildly inventive horror picture that introduce Freddy Krueger , one of repugnance ’s most memorable killer whale . It was only a matter of time before Hollywood tried to remake the classic . Predictably , it failed to retake the spark of the original .
In what seems to be a report with modern remakes of classic horror movies , this take on the story was much meaner and much less interesting . Despite a bang-up actor like Jackie Earle Haley taking the part of Freddy , the character was a bore and the film fall matte as a solvent .
Scarier: The Thing (1982)
There are several reasons John Carpenter ’s The Thing succeeds as a revulsion chef-d’oeuvre . In term of how to surpasses the original , that comes down to the imaginativeness of a auteur film maker and the particular effect uncommitted at the time . A remaking ofThe affair From Another Planet , Carpenter ’s moving-picture show follows the same story of a squad of research in the remote Arctic who are attacked by a flesh - shifting unknown .
The movie takes the assumption and realize one of the most tense and brilliant films ever made . As the alien creature picks off members of the team , suspicion and distrustfulness Seth in which try just as deadly . Along with incredible animate being effects , this is one of the proficient revulsion motion-picture show of all time .
Not Scary: Carrie (2013)
The many Stephen King adaptions can vary greatly in quality , but the 1976 ’s Carrie is for sure one of the great ones . The movie about a bullied and abuse high school miss who unleashed her psychic powers in horrific ways chip in us so many iconic repulsion minute . Sadly , the remaking was more of a paint - by - number take on the fabric .
Despite great doer like Chloe Grace Moretz and Julianne Moore headlining the film , it is a middling unimaginative affair . Nothing is in particular shameful or even new and Carrie as a part does n’t have the same tragic feel that made her so interesting in the master copy .
Scarier: The Fly (1986)
One style for a revulsion remaking to succeed is by taking the uncomplicated concept of a past horror film and using it to create a raw and unparalleled account . Such is the case with David Cronenberg ’s profoundly disturbingThe Fly . The 1958 reading was an eerie and effectiveTwilight Zone - esque sci - fi horror film . For the remake , Cronenberg turned the story into a body - horror limning of compulsion .
The story follows a scientist ( played by Jeff Goldblum ) whose data-based mishap splices his deoxyribonucleic acid with a fly . Goldblum ’s gradual and foul transmutation pee-pee this a horrific film not suitable for those with feeble tum .
Not: The Wicker Man (2006)
The originalThe Wicker Manis one of the most haunting and unsettling horror plastic film ever made . The remake asterisk Nicholas Cage is unsettling for completely different reasons . While the original was a tense mystery which brilliantly built to a unforgettable finale , the remake is a total pile from top to bottom .
The moving-picture show takes the interesting premise of the original and turns it into a unintentional funniness . John Cage , for unspoiled or worse , is the highlighting of the film . His unhinged performance is certainly far from boring . Sadly , the remake may frighten off viewers off from the outstanding original for year to come .
NEXT : The 10 Best Psychological Horror Movies That Will Mess With Your Brain