Superbad
BooksmartandSuperbadare both brilliant films in their own rightfulness . Both movies deal with the approaching of long time account of two inseparable besties who find themselves desperate to unleash their inner " # FOMO " before calibrate high school . Beanie Feldstein ’s character , Molly , is strikingly alike to Jonah Hill ’s Seth , and it helps that the two actors are siblings in real life story .
Meanwhile , Kaitlyn Dever ’s Amy give off the same endearingly awkward vibes as Michael Cera before her . While there are a ton of similarity between both films , they each glisten as unique and individual experiences severally . So , let ’s compare the two . What doesBooksmartdo easily thanSuperbad , and vice versa ? get ’s discover out !
BETTER: BOOKSMART IS MORE VISUALLY INTERESTING
Superbadisn’t nearly as interesting when it fare to its filming and optic creative thinking while in equivalence toBooksmart . WhileSuperbadis a classic photographic film with a lot to offer , there is slight to no visual drollery in it ( unless you want to count Seth ’s drawings).Booksmart , on the other hand , is constantly inventive and colorful with its visual work .
Whether it ’s the two little girl morphing into revive Barbie Dolls after waste special strawberry or whether it ’s the gorgeous sequence shot under cobalt blue waters as Amy get her meat torn to pieces , almost every scene offers something more visually unequalled than the next . For example , when Molly inscribe the house party and sees her infatuation Nick , she could just pucker her hair behind her spike while blush at the base . Instead , we get a screaming scene where the lights dim low as she and Nick do a dramatically choreograph dance number to to a fault romanticist euphony . That ’s the kind of visual comedy that forward-looking - day film need a whole lot more of , so we salute you , Booksmart , for imagine outside the box .
WORSE: SUPERBAD IS THE ORIGINAL VERSION
AlthoughBooksmartandSuperbadare two unlike and individual films , it is no secret that there are a mountain of pretty big law of similarity between the two .
The whole plot of Olivia Wilde ’s film is wildly exchangeable toSuperbad , along with the characters as well . So , in this causa , we ’re going to have to giveSuperbadcredit where it ’s due , seeing that it is the original version of these two undeniably similar films .
BETTER: BOOKSMART IS GROUNDBREAKING
WhileSuperbadmay be fantastically funny , it is by no means ground - break movie house . There ’s nothing meaning inSuperbadthat we have n’t meet before in previous pic . Since its release , we had already been heavily exposed to the whole " focus on the misfit " slant , had already reckon several " bromance " films , and had of row been excessively display to the whole " loser - hombre - gets - the - spicy - girl - somehow " dynamic . Booksmart , on the other hand , can be considered ground - breakage for several reason .
For one , it is a mainstream film that finally rivet on the romantic electric discharge between two women without making a big deal at all over the fact that they ’re gay . It just is what it is , and everyone can accept it as they should . Superbadhasn’t needfully aged well in equivalence , with its cheesy and dated jokes . What also makesBooksmartso important is its focus on the female version of a " bromance , " which is a rarified discovery in film , yet it is becoming more and more recognize with the likes ofBridesmaids , LadyBird , andBroad City .
WORSE: SUPERBAD IS MORE REALISTIC
EitherSuperbadis more naturalistic while depicting the average high schooling experience , or we ’ve gotten old enough to postulate a walk stick . In our age in gamey school , no - onewas as prissy and accepting as they are inBooksmart . Then again , perhaps times really have changed in the past half of a decade and everyoneisas inclusive and candid - minded as they all seem to be in Olivia Wilde ’s film .
As much as we should strive for this to be the case , for the majority of shoal across America , it is not . That is whySuperbadwins for portraying a more accurate and self - deprecate depiction of the modal high school experience , thus make it more relatable to audiences .
BETTER: BOOKSMART HAS A BETTER CONCEPT
The whole construct ofBooksmartis a lot more originative and overall more intellectually stimulant thanSuperbad . In Olivia Wilde ’s plastic film , the conception is that getting straight A ’s and constantly studying or else of partying does n’t mechanically make you more sound than everyone else . That ’s just being " book smart " .
When Molly and Amy recognize you may be an intellectualanddo kegful stands at parties , they lead off to modernise major # FOMO . This concept is a lot more interesting and at the same time more stimulating thanSuperbad ’s dewy-eyed " allow ’s end gamy school with a bang " formula that we ’ve sure seen before .
WORSE: McLOVIN VS JARED
InBooksmart , Jared is a character who feels strikingly similar to McLovin in the sense that they ’re both extremely awkward geek who , at the same time , somehow seem to exudate this effortless trust that ’s almost charming .
While Jared is interesting enough and surely likable without a doubt , he is nothing compared to McLovin , who is just an inst classic of a character . Over a decade sinceSuperbad ’s release , we still cite McLovin to this day . Superbadtakes the cake with this type of type who just garners more jest than Jared .
BETTER: BOOKSMART IS A MORE NECESSARY FILM
Superbadis a good film , but it is n’t exactly a necessary film . In other words , our human race would likely be just the same if it was never released ( yet a macrocosm without McLovin source is not needs a world we ’d care to live on in).Booksmart , though , seems much more necessary , because it renormalise so many thing that are still considered stigmatized , even in 2019 .
It fully normalizes lesbian family relationship , it normalize distaff sexuality , and it normalizes women who are not all a size zero . Booksmartdepicts a universe that oozes with banker’s acceptance and cellular inclusion without ever running of the endangerment of becoming preachy . It gives everyone a part , peculiarly those who have previously not had one in cinema . In that sense , it is much more necessary in comparison toSuperbad .
WORSE: AMY VS EVAN
Although Amy ( Kaitlyn Dever ) is an incredible character , Michael Cera just seems to be more endow in his portrayal of Evan . With Michael Cera , he cast his whole eubstance into the awkwardness of his fictional character , while Kaitlyn Dever ’s Amy just does n’t seem to have the same campaign or vigor invest in her part .
For example , in the scene where the characters Amy and Molly are complimenting each other on their outfits , Beanie Feldstein is break with vim , while Kaitlyn Dever looks a fleck stagnant - eyed as though she ’s waiting for Wilde to call " cut!“so she can go home and take a long sleep . Although Dever does a great task in the film , it ’s just small moments when you feel as though she could ’ve take aim her performance a measure further , which makes you apprize the body of work Michael Cera put into his use .
BETTER: BOOKSMART’S SOUNDTRACK VS SUPERBAD
The soundtrack forSuperbadis pretty nifty , but the musical choices forBooksmartare even better . The soundtrack is wildly crucial in a film , because it sets up the mood and the vigor for any given prospect . Superbaddefinitely has the right soundtrack so as to pump up the push , yetBooksmartis able to step that energy up a notch , including during the setting that are intend to be emotional .
The soundtrack alters from being both insanely fun and wildly heartbreaking when it need to be . During the scene in the kitty when Amy view her crush kiss Molly ’s crush , " Slip Away " by Perfume Genius plays , and it is undeniably haunt . There is nothing " undeniably haunting " inSuperbad , if we ’re just going to be truthful .
BETTER: BOOKSMART HAS BILLIE LOURD AS GIGI
The one missing ingredient ofSuperbadis a grapheme who is as incredible and uproarious as Billie Lourd ’s Gigi . Gigi lights up our whole globe , she sparks a fire in our pump , and she is so meme - worthy it ’s not even funny .
Gigi will go down in the Book as one of the most iconic film characters of all clock time , and we know Carrie Fisher is somewhere seem down at her daughter , beaming with superbia . Gigi alone givesSuperbada major run for its money , and we ’d pay to see a spinoff dedicated to this wizardly character who just came out of nowhere like a sparkling unicorn in early-2000s clothing .
NEXT : Billie Lourd ’s Gigi Is The full Part Of Booksmart ( & need A Spinoff )
