Related
The news that Paramount greenlit Quentin Tarantino ’s proposedStar Trekfilm chevvy a huge reception from theStar Trekfan biotic community , with many expressing headache that a director as fond of violence , sex , blood , and swearing could shepherd something as precious as aStar Trekproject . But the sensing that Tarantino is a sorry fit for the enfranchisement ignores some pretty solid reasons not to can its potential just yet .
WhenStar Trek IVstalled due to contract dispute and adept Chris Hemsworth ’s reported dissatisfaction with the script , Tarantino ’s labor had a absolved luck had n’t felt like a tangible opening before . Now that it ’s formally a go , fans are face up what this could signify forStar Trekand an already bloody-minded fandom has n’t been afraid to share their thoughts . The opinions range from cautious curiosity to abject rejection , which has become moderately the average for most of the news come out ofStar TreksinceStar Trek : Discoverypremiered . The addition of Michael Burnham to canon as the half - sis who was raised with Spock , but one he ’d never alluded to in 50 year of premature canon remain a source of contention forStar Trek : Discoveryhaters , and there are multitudinous other vehement objection to everything from the design to its emplacement behind a paywall . To these very outspoken people , Tarantino ’s film ( and it ’s R - Rating ) represents the potential for what they would consider another task that would irrevocably damage and change theStar Trekbrand . But it ’s also not just them .
More evenhanded phallus of theStar Trekcommunity are also questioning Tarantino ’s power to make a film that service the franchise and not his own sensibilities , which is a fair question when we ’re talking about a director who ’s used to having artistic freedom . Many are convinced there ’s no way Tarantino would or could give his distinguishable style enough to fit seamlessly into their perception ofStar Trek . That say , this is n’t completely unjustified devotee fear , it ’s a valid care from those who ’ve seen the franchise sharply reborn in recent days , and at times , dubiously executed .
But even that justified concern does n’t void the reasonsa TarantinoStar Trekcould just be a playfulness spectacle . Tarantino is n’t the theatre director we need for the rest of the franchise , and credibly never again after this film , but we can make a case for there being a place for him just this once .
What Star Trek Can Do For Quentin Tarantino
One of the many things that distinguishesStar Trekfilms from the films Tarantino makes is that a Star Trek flick would be based on exist oeuvre . Tarantino ’s well - have sex for writing his own script and solely working with original properties , except in the case ofJackie Brown . Jackie Brownwas an adaptation of the Elmore Leonard novelRum Punch , and while the 1997 film flopped at the box office , it ’s originate into apopular Tarantino mysterious cutthat ’s still extol by critics for many reasonableness , include Tarantino ’s ability to pay homage to the blaxploitation celluloid it intended to serve .
Jackie Brownproves Tarantino can genre - match . To work within the comparatively tight bounds ofStar Trek’svalues , Tarantino would probably have to cut short his esthetic wings considerably , but he ’s certainly capable of harnessing someone else ’s vision . And because of his literacy in unlike musical style , we can bank he ’s dear at honoring what made that genre or dimension perennially popular . Just because he ’s never made anything even close to how sanitizedStar Trekis does n’t think of he ca n’t . But all that said , he can entirely procreate vintageStar Trek , but he ’s not going to . And that could turn out to be such a good thing .
What Quentin Tarantino Can Bring To Star Trek
One of the reasonsStar Trekfans get so bended out of shape about canon and dash amendment is that they ’re a substantial part ofStar Trek’sappeal . Its age combined with itsability to maintain a consistent values systemfor over 50 years - not to remark consistent canyon - has turnedStar Trekfans into people who watch the serial publication as a womb-to-tomb familiar and love it like category . There are definitely sections that just do n’t like change and object to any newTrekproject , but there are also fans who care so deeply about preserving the unity of Roddenberry ’s progressive nonesuch and humanist values , that the idea of someone contort them is deeply disconcerting and clearly so .
That said , it ’s potential to maintain those value and still entrust way for some Tarantino flare , and that mashup has the potential to be an excitingalt - view of theStar Trekwe know so well . We ’re not attend for a blank opera house and we ’re not daydreaming about Picard and Kirk bobble aside Klingons with Uzi , butStar Trekcould stick to its roots and still lease Tarantino make a daydream for us - those root are dug deep and some parentage , cuss , sex , and probably cocain is n’t operate to erase 50 years of story or tarnishStar Trekforever . But taking such a huge risk could foretell very positive returns if it call on out to be a success .
Tarantino ’s a turgid filmmaker who works on a grand scale in nearly every capacity . Star Trekis one of the most well - known place in amusement history . Them mashing - up could produce something truly unique and precious , and potentially makeStar Trekculturally and cinematically relevant in an unprecedented way . This film represent a bold experiment andStar Trekis nothing if not an example of how changes in formatting and flair can develop construct in overconfident room . Deep Space Nineis a unadulterated deterrent example of how fans now freeze off the series ' drastic differences withThe Next Generation , but it was those differences that have allowed the series to brook for as long as it has . It ’s entirely potential the sick scientist combo ofStar Trekand Tarantino could grow something of significant artistic value .
But just the one fourth dimension , please .
Why Quentin Tarantino’s Star Trek Shouldn’t Start A New Franchise
We ’re excited at the melodic theme of a TarantinoStar Trek , but justoneTarantinoStar Trek . Experiments in var. and style like these can produce fun , jubilant spectacle , but spectacles are fun in part because they ’re not the norm . Sure , it ’s fun to suppose a Dr. Beverly Crusher rifle on aKill Billrampage after Jack ’s destruction , but if it were in reality the chronicle it would be ridiculous . There ’s no way Tarantino does n’t produce something that ’s distinctly Tarantino , and while we ’ve commented on the potential good such a risk of infection could do , we desire this moving picture to continue a one - off .
This is ultimately a very premature time to be saying something like this , but it ’s hard to ideate Tarantino producing anyStar Trekmovie without try some boundries . If he make more than one or if that style starts to governStar Trek’scinematic arm , it will do just what fans are afraid it will do and move disappointingly further afield from Gene Roddenberry ’s original mission . That represent a flake of a catch-22 given we ’re fundamentally wishing the movie to be good , but also not be something to replicate . William Shatner might not mind profanity , but we still think that and Tarantino ’s greater esthesia would make for unspoiled seasoning , but not an entire meal .
NEXT : The Star Trek Episodes That Quentin Tarantino May plow Into a Movie
