As the original risible account book superhero , Supermanhas been a staple of American popping acculturation for decades now . While he has had many great successes across many media platforms , some reading have certainly been better than others . In being such a “ Boy Scout ” as Batman like to call him , Superman has often been the lucky example of goodness in the world as well as humanness .

However , there have definitely been a few moments where the quality has made some jolly tough sagaciousness calls , occasionally drawing his morality into question . With movie theater especially , Superman has made a number of decisions that tend to break from his traditional portraiture . To look back at some of the large , here is our inclination of 10 questionable moral decisions Superman has made in the movies .

Donating a Strand of His Hair (Superman IV, 1987)

InSuperman IV : The Quest For Peace , it is revealed that Superman has donated a single strand of his hair to a museum . While it makes sense for the grapheme to do something charitable like that , he still should have known that it was going to backfire in the way that it did .

basically , Superman volunteered a strand of his DNA , know it was go to be kept in a public berth where someone could slip it . Granted , many other things are wrong with the film aside from Superman ’s mute decision . Though this scenario is n’t on the nose a inquiry of morality , but rather intelligence , Superman should have still have sex easily .

Letting His Father Die (Man of Steel, 2013)

In one of the more controversial moments of 2013’sMan of Steel , Jonathan Kent ( Kevin Costner ) sacrifices himself to stop his son from revealing himself to the world . In Jonathan ’s mind , the world simply was n’t ready to discover what someone like Clark could do . While Jonathan ’s attitudes and belief in this pic make sense , many have noted that Clark would still have saved his founding father from the incoming tornado .

Though some fans also support this determination , it is still a virtuously confutative decision for the character . Despite the changes Zack Snyder was going for , this view is one of the more drastic exit from the traditional idea of Superman .

Traveling Back in Time (Superman, 1978)

Christopher Reeve and Richard Donner managed to wow audiences everywhere with the debut ofSuperman(1978 ) . As the first major live - activity installment for the character , Supermanis still debate by many to be the bestSupermanfilm to date . It perfectly captures everything that make the character great .

However , for how great the photographic film is , Superman still makes a middling big , virtuously ambiguous determination . Towards the end of the film , Superman uses his power to travel back in time and saveLois Lanefrom demise . While audiences were happy to see the couple together at the end , Superman himself was warned by his Kryptonian parent against actions such as this . It ’s definitely a minute of a gray field for the fiber .

Killing Zod (Superman II, 1980)

At the remnant of the film , Superman wield to trick them and take their abilities off , practically making them human . After he does so though , he then proceeds to knock all of them down under the Fortress of Solitude , implying that they fell to their Death . Considering how Superman is traditionally depicted as the ultimate hero who saves even the villain , this is well one of the most questionable conclusion the role has made on plastic film .

Killing Zod (Man of Steel, 2013)

Superman has a knack for killingGeneral Zod . After doing it both inSuperman IIand in the comic , he would do it yet again inMan of Steel . After all other Kryptonians were transport back to the Phantom Zone , Superman and Zod were the only two remaining . In one last battle between the two , Zod observe himself with the upper script , jeopardise to incinerate a human mob .

Knowing what Zod is capable of , Superman makes the fabulously operose decision to snap the villain ’s neck , putting a permanent end to his character . Though this was a very gray decision for the character , it was at least a very painful moment for him . Henry Cavill ’s Superman is very distinctly waste by what he felt he had to do , unlike Reeve ’s , who was smile with Lois and Lex after vote out Zod .

Giving Up His Powers (Superman II, 1980)

If the comedian have establish anything , it is that Superman does not need to give up his powers in decree to have anormal relationship with Lois . Though it was a very poignant sacrifice inSuperman II , the loss of Superman is something that would have been felt across the cosmos .

grant , this decision of his did finally aid him defeat Zod in the end , though he had no way of life of knowing that at the time . Despite being a touching sacrifice , give up his powers to have the same relationship that he already had is still jolly questionable .

Almost Everything in Superman III (1983)

With a plot that involves Superman slowly turning malign thanks to an artificial form of Kryptonite , it would make signified that he would have made some morally questionable decisions in this film . However , Superman IIIis typically depicted as only being marginally honorable thanSuperman IV . With many other problems plaguing the film , Superman ’s ethical motive is n’t the only thing audiences interrogate .

Furthermore , the type ’s personality was supposed to be called into judgement . Though it did n’t precisely serve it to capture the same charm from the first two , Superman ’s darker shift in this film ultimately led to a very weird encounter with himself .

Abandoning Earth (Superman Returns, 2006)

When Warner Brothers tried to revive the charm and personal magnetism of the first two Christopher Reeve films , the result was the less - than - stellarSuperman Returns . In this film , Brandon Routh star as Superman with the story go around around his income tax return from the ruin of Krypton . As the plot begin to stretch , we discover that Superman left Earth to investigate the ruination for himself .

It ’s   a very tenuous reason for the zep to vanish for so long , and a morally questionable decision . For all the good Superman has done on Earth and all the menace he ’s save it from , it just does n’t make much common sense that he would abandon it on a whim .

Fighting Batman (Batman vs. Superman, 2016)

At the time of the gravid showdown between the two , Superman ended up having a very respectable reason to confront off against Batman . However , he definitely could have done more to try and convince Batman to avail him . Towards the starting line of the fight , Superman does test to verbalize to Batman , and though he plead with him once again at the end of the scrap , he could have done a lot more to try and convert Batman to listen to him .

Fighting the Justice League (Justice League, 2017)

Though it is still easy to forgive Superman in this tantrum , he very well could have done something that he would have regretted . Likewise , in comparison to the comic version of the zep , it was also a very dark turn . Thankfully , he presently came back as his normal ego , just in time to help oneself the repose of the League .

NEXT : Batman : 10 virtuously Questionable Decisions He Has Made in the Movies

How Goku can beat Superman, explained.

James Gunn’s Superman and Krypto comic

Jon Kent (AKA Superman’s Young Adult Son) with Kryptonite in the background

Superman Bad Movie Decisions Feature

Lex Luthor and his nephew Lenny use bolt cutters in Superman IV

Kevin Costner as Jonathan Kent in Man of Steel

Christopher Reeve in his classic Superman suit in Superman (1978)

Christopher Reeve’s Superman bows to Terence Stamp’s Zod in Superman II

Superman killing Zod in Man of Steel

Superman II red sun chamber

Sythetic Kryptonite Superman III

Brandon Routh in Superman Returns

Superman squares up to Batman in Batman v Superman

Superman in a scene in Justice League

Movies

Superman