Related
Two months ago , Valve take a sales booth againstSteam negative follow-up bombingbut how does it plan to address positive review bombs ? That ’s a pickle the companionship line up itself in with the recent inundation of glad feedback forAssassin ’s Creed : Unity .
Ubisoft ’s 2014 historic epic , correct in French Revolution - earned run average Paris , was given out destitute of accusation in answer to the tragic Notre Dame cathedral flame back in April . The game ’s immaculately detailed Notre Dame was also reference as apotentially helpful referencefor rebuilding the darling watershed . The Steam community showed newfound appreciation and excitement forAssassin ’s Creed : Unityby showering the formerly scorned title with shine review . This uptick inUnity ’s positive receipt for apparently irrelevant circumstances would seem to , on composition , dishonour Steam ’s guidepost for off - topic brushup bombing . This has apparently go out Valve with little idea how to address the opposite occurrent .
Related : Valve support Getting It faulty , And It Does n’t wish
Valve ’s unusual blog post discussing the issue reads more as an internal back and away than a direct opinion to the community . The party admits that they had considered the possibility of positive review bombing when create their guidelines but had no real - populace example to reference work . They stateUnity ’s situation does n’t fit their established rules from a data standpoint because the game go through a material rise in players . After all , negative review bombardment generally damages a game ’s player count . Valve then says that despite many of the reviews reference either Notre Dame or the giveaway , most fare off as even posts from what they think wait like new or fall players . Here ’s an example of Valve ’s orbitual discourse :
" We ’re not really certain what to do here . It does n’t actually seem to be a follow-up bomb in the way we ’ve antecedently define them , but maybe that ’s just our definition being untimely . But even if we fix it as one , we ’re not sure where it should be off - issue or not … So either way , the plot itself would n’t be sham by our decision . "
Valve go on to excogitate out loud if a changing context around a title affect its objective quality and if opinions surrounding said circumstance should be number . As an deterrent example , they place to howUnitynow features one of the best recreations of an intact Notre Dame in the world and how that could be a possible selling tip . This topic light a fairly puzzling ego - debate where Valve asks more doubt ( of itself ) and acquaint additional divinatory scenarios . In the remnant , Valve ’s prescribed reaction is literally “ we do n’t really do it ” and they conclude they ’re move to leaveUnityalone for now . They also leave it up to the residential district to rework the definition of review bombardment and ask their view on how to cover the position .
Valve ’s answer reads like a party brainstorm school term or an editorial essay instead of a clear position on the matter . To write something that confusing only to fundamentally end with a berm shrug is n’t a great look . It does , however , trend with the company’sincreasingly hands - off approachto run Steam andquestionable interactions with users . On a happy note , it has been refreshing to see review bombardment used for more irrefutable treatment , at least .
Next : Ex - Valve Employee Says Steam Was Killing Gaming Before Epic Games Store
germ : Valve / Steam Blog
